Reflections on General Convention
There are some experiences, like riding a bike or
flying, that are hard to explain without actually doing it. This holds true for attending General
Convention. I have wanted to go to GC for many years, but finances and other
obligations prevented that from happening.
Since I was elected by our Diocesan Convention to be a Deputy, the way
was made open to me, and I am thrilled to have now experienced this incredible
gathering. As The Rev. Dr. Gregory
Straub, Executive Officer and Secretary of General Convention, states, “General
Convention is a combination of legislative assembly, bazaar of goods and
services and family reunion. It is one of the most exciting and, truth be told,
one of the most awe-inspiring gatherings in the world.” I would add that it is also part revival, as
I attended many wonderful Eucharist services with excellent preaching and
signing.
I have always been fascinated at how our church’s structure and polity invites each and every member of the church to participate in the decision making process. At GC, I got to participate first-hand in how that actually works, from the submission of a resolution, to its vetting by a legislative committee, its presentation on the Convention floor, the process for amending a resolution and voting on accepting or rejecting the resolution. All resolutions must be passed in the same language by a majority vote by both the House of Deputies and the House of Bishops in order for a resolution to become an action of the General Convention.
There were over 450 resolutions put forth at this GC. You can see a list of all the resolutions that were acted on at this GC at http://www.generalconvention.org/gc/resolutions.
Reject – not accepted; the resolution “dies”
Concur-Discharge – the matter may have been dealt with in another resolution
Refer – the matter was too complex to be dealt with effectively by the GC and was sent to a Standing Committee, Commission, Board or Agency (CCAB) of the Episcopal Church for further study.
I look forward to talking about General Convention with you more in the fall. In the meantime, if you have questions, please talk with me.
I have always been fascinated at how our church’s structure and polity invites each and every member of the church to participate in the decision making process. At GC, I got to participate first-hand in how that actually works, from the submission of a resolution, to its vetting by a legislative committee, its presentation on the Convention floor, the process for amending a resolution and voting on accepting or rejecting the resolution. All resolutions must be passed in the same language by a majority vote by both the House of Deputies and the House of Bishops in order for a resolution to become an action of the General Convention.
There were over 450 resolutions put forth at this GC. You can see a list of all the resolutions that were acted on at this GC at http://www.generalconvention.org/gc/resolutions.
The possible actions for those resolutions are:
Concur, Adopt – both houses agree with the
resolution and will enact its mandateReject – not accepted; the resolution “dies”
Concur-Discharge – the matter may have been dealt with in another resolution
Refer – the matter was too complex to be dealt with effectively by the GC and was sent to a Standing Committee, Commission, Board or Agency (CCAB) of the Episcopal Church for further study.
The process was exhilarating, exhausting and
heartbreaking. It was thrilling to participate
in the UTO Ingathering Eucharist with over 3000 Episcopalians and breaking out
into spontaneous applauds (not allowing according to the House’s Rules of Order)
after passing resolution C095 on restructuring by unanimous vote. Nine 14-hour days of work is tiring on the
body, mind and spirit. And it was
painful to hear from those who understand themselves to be “orthodox” offer
their point of view that the General Convention was acting in error by
approving the use of a rite for same-sex blessings and by not taking a definitive
position on the Anglican Covenant. As a
person who desires to find consensus, I am deeply saddened when our common love
for Jesus Christ and the ritual of our tradition may not be enough to allow us
to continue to walk this path together.
I remain optimistic as I cannot deny the presence
of the Holy Spirit throughout the Convention.
When our church focuses our
energy on loving God and loving our neighbor as ourselves, we can do all God
has given us to do – to learn, experience and share God’s transforming love in
Jesus Christ through the power of the Holy Spirit. No political structure or personal ideology should
mitigate that in any way.
I look forward to talking about General Convention with you more in the fall. In the meantime, if you have questions, please talk with me.
In Christ,
Rev. Valerie+
Comments
Post a Comment